<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pick me up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up</link>
	<description>it&#039;s probably awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up/comment-page-1#comment-15418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up/#comment-15418</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s a piece of trash that people read because there&#039;s nothing else to do. It&#039;s also a fantastic opportunity for advertisers.

The other interesting thing is the journalistic standard, as you mentioned. I&#039;m not sure exactly how it works, but I was reading an interesting article the other day about the percentage of generic articles published online. I couldn&#039;t be stuffed finding it, but a foul majority of articles are all from the same source, because it&#039;s cheaper and easier. It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if this was becoming the case in print media as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a piece of trash that people read because there&#8217;s nothing else to do. It&#8217;s also a fantastic opportunity for advertisers.</p>
<p>The other interesting thing is the journalistic standard, as you mentioned. I&#8217;m not sure exactly how it works, but I was reading an interesting article the other day about the percentage of generic articles published online. I couldn&#8217;t be stuffed finding it, but a foul majority of articles are all from the same source, because it&#8217;s cheaper and easier. It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if this was becoming the case in print media as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up/comment-page-1#comment-15415</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up/#comment-15415</guid>
		<description>Yeah and the fact they hate on QR every 3 pages pisses me off too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah and the fact they hate on QR every 3 pages pisses me off too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tate</title>
		<link>http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up/comment-page-1#comment-15408</link>
		<dc:creator>Tate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owened.net/2008/03/27/pick-me-up/#comment-15408</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s terrible paper. I only read &quot;The Australian&quot; on Saturday mornings :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s terrible paper. I only read &#8220;The Australian&#8221; on Saturday mornings :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

